Top 4 Alternatives to Nearshore Software Development Outsourcing
Sure, nearshore software development has its perks, but it’s not always the best fit for everyone.
Maybe your project is buried under so many regulations that outsourcing SaaS development just feels like a headache. Or perhaps keeping costs in check is your top priority, and nearshore doesn’t quite add up.
No worries — there’s always a better option out there.
We’ve rounded up a list of alternatives to nearshore software development outsourcing for multiple scenarios. Take a look and find the perfect match for your project.
In our guide on nearshore software development, we’ve pointed out a couple of situations where this model might not be the best match:
- Rapid updates for fast-moving IT startups
- Hardware-heavy development projects
However, based on our experience, a skilled team can successfully handle these challenges — provided they follow best practices for setting up a nearshore software development team.
Not sure if nearshoring is right for you? Let’s find out!
Book a call, and we’ll see if it’s a good fit. If not, we’ll recommend other options. We only take on projects we can deliver.
Contact DigiteumSo, if you decide that this model isn’t the right fit for you, we’ll guide you through the alternatives to nearshore.
With in-house software development, everything is pretty straightforward: you hire people, put them on the payroll, and they become your employees.
When is this the right choice?
- Projects closely tied to physical operations. Think about a company developing hardware like medical devices or smart home gadgets. If you need constant on-site testing and your engineering and production teams rely on it, keeping things local makes perfect sense.
- Projects where nearshoring loses its edge. If developer rates are similar to in-house salaries, the cost-saving edge disappears – and managing external teams adds extra hassle. In these cases, sticking with an in-house team is often the smarter move.
Now that we’ve covered some common scenarios, let’s check the pros and cons of in-house development so you can make a well-informed decision when choosing alternatives to nearshore outsourcing.
| Pros of in-house | Cons of in-house |
|---|---|
| Full control over the team and process | Higher overhead costs (salaries, benefits, etc.) |
| Deep knowledge of your company culture and product | Limited access to specialized skills without hiring extra staff |
| Speaking the same language | Time-consuming recruitment and retention efforts |
| Direct communication with stakeholders for real-time feedback | Potential for burnout with a small, overworked team |
| Easier alignment with long-term business goals | Challenges with scaling up and down |
Among alternative outsourcing models in software development, offshoring can feel like the complete opposite of in-house. Instead of having everyone in one place, you’re working with a team halfway across the world, juggling different time zones and cultural differences.
Still, in some cases, offshoring is the smartest choice. Here’s when it makes sense:
- Cost-driven projects. When you’re working with a tight budget, offshore teams in cost-effective regions offer skilled talent at a lower price.
- Tasks that don’t rely on real-time communication. In this case, working across time zones isn’t an issue, and you can take advantage of cost savings and the right expertise.
- Access to specialized talent. Finding the right partner with the right skills and industry-specific expertise can be tough. Offshoring opens up markets to help you find exactly what you need.
Here’s an example from our portfolio: A healthcare software company from California needed to modernize its UI for EHR manager platform. They had strong server-side expertise but limited design and frontend capabilities, so they turned to offshoring.
Their main needs? Strong English skills, regular status calls despite the time zone differences, and pricing more favorable than US rates. Digiteum was their choice.
We redesigned the interface, while their in-house team handled the backend, letting them modernize the app without overloading their team.
| Pros of offshoring | Cons of offshoring |
|---|---|
| Access talent globally at a lower cost | Syncing communication schedules can be tricky |
| Easily scale up or down your team as needed | Cultural differences can lead to misunderstandings |
| Hire specialists with unique expertise from anywhere | Blending offshore and in-house teams takes extra effort |
| Spend less time on recruitment and more on strategy | Differences in legal and business frameworks |
| Set up a team for large-scale complex projects faster | Low language proficiency can impact communication |
A model that keeps things local but gives you access to specialized talent is onshoring. With onshoring, you hire experts from within your own country, staying close to their skills without full company control or internal integration.
In which scenarios does this model work?
- Projects requiring real-time collaboration. Onshore teams typically operate in the same time zone, making it easy to sync communication schedules and have real-time discussions.
- Native speakers on board. With onshoring, the team speaks the same language and communicates easily.
- Hardware-dependent projects. Onshore teams can work directly with your hardware or other physical assets, while still offering cost-effective talent within the same country. This is especially helpful for businesses in expensive cities like New York.
| Pros of onshoring | Cons of onshoring |
|---|---|
| Teams share similar work habits, language, and work ethics | Local talent often comes at a premium compared to offshore and nearshore options |
| Lower rates in some onshore locations compared to expensive hubs/capital | May lack specialized skills available in other regions |
| Teams are closer to in-house operations | Limited access to global perspectives and approaches |
| Work in the same business and legal environment | High demand for talent in your country can lead to slower hiring |
Another option that many of Digiteum’s clients favor is the hybrid approach — a mix of different strategies within a single project. This model lets you hire the right talents (by the way, check out our software development outsourcing guide for tips) for different parts of the project, ensuring a perfect balance of cost and quality.
Picture this: A UK company is developing a smart home device. Their Oxford-based team takes care of hardware development because they need hands-on access to prototypes and testing equipment. For the cloud backend and mobile apps, they work with a nearshore team in Poland — efficient, aligned, and easy to collaborate with. Meanwhile, routine tasks like documentation or data entry are handled by an offshore team in Southeast Asia, where timelines are more flexible.
This approach lets you play to the strengths of each model, optimizing cost, efficiency, and expertise.
Here are a few scenarios where the hybrid approach works best:
- Tech startup scaling fast. A startup moving at lightning speed can balance speed and costs with a hybrid setup. For example, the in-house team shapes the vision and handles sensitive IP, a nearshore team builds the MVP quickly, and an offshore team takes care of testing and routine tasks. It’s fast, efficient, and keeps the core team focused.
- Multi-platform product development. Building for multiple platforms? A hybrid approach makes it all smoother. Your in-house team ensures everything stays consistent and on-brand, a nearshore team provides SaaS application development services for the platforms, and an offshore team takes care of QA, documentation, and the smaller tasks. It’s streamlined and resource-smart.
- Large-scale digital transformation. For major shifts like modernizing legacy systems or integrating new tech, a hybrid model eases the workload. For example, your in-house team can handle strategy and sensitive work, while a nearshore team takes care of integrations and development.
- Complex long-term projects. For projects that evolve over time, a hybrid model offers flexibility. A nearshore team can easily scale up or down as needed, while your in-house team focuses on core tasks.
| Pros of hybrid | Cons of hybrid |
|---|---|
| Combines the strengths of multiple approaches to suit project needs | Multiple external partners can create silos and slow down workflows |
| Lower risk of disruption from regional issues | Different work styles may slow down progress |
| Parallel work streams can accelerate timelines for complex projects | Managing multiple teams requires strong project management skills |
Digiteum is a trusted tech vendor providing nearshore software development services across Europe since 2010.
Our values? Responsibility and honesty. Here’s what it means if you contact us:
- When you reach out to us, we’ll take the time to understand your needs and give you an honest recommendation — even if that means suggesting alternatives to nearshore software development outsourcing, just like we’ve done for other clients.
- We’re not just execs ticking off boxes; we’re hands-on and involved in every step. If something doesn’t add up — whether it’s timelines, KPIs, or processes — we’ll work with you to find solutions that fit within your constraints.
- Our reputation is everything to us. It’s built on the trust of our partners — some of whom have been with us for 15 years.
A responsible tech partner is priceless — even if you end up choosing someone else
We’re that partner. Our experts will assess if pure nearshore or a hybrid setup will work for you — and if not, we’ll tell you why.
Contact us
